Trump Floats $30 Billion Civil Nuclear Deal to Iran Amid Ceasefire

In a stunning diplomatic pivot, Trump Floats $30 Billion Civil Nuclear Deal to Iran Amid Ceasefire. Following weeks of military confrontation, the Trump administration has quietly proposed a high-stakes deal to Iran: $30 billion in investments, sanctions relief, and access to frozen assets in return for abandoning uranium enrichment.

According to multiple sources cited by CNN, the proposal includes rebuilding Iran’s nuclear program under strict civilian-only terms, modeled after the UAE’s non-enrichment nuclear blueprint. The deal aims to prevent Iran from pursuing nuclear weapons, stabilize the Middle East, and reinforce the fragile Israel-Iran ceasefire brokered by the U.S. and Qatar.

Despite its bombastic military posture, the Trump administration is now aggressively pursuing a long-term diplomatic breakthrough a move both hailed and questioned by foreign policy experts.

Trump Floats $30 Billion Civil Nuclear Deal to Iran Amid Ceasefire

Secret Talks Amid Ceasefire

Sources confirm that the proposed nuclear deal took shape during a closed-door meeting at the White House last Friday.

US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff met with Gulf partners to flesh out a framework aimed at restarting stalled US-Iran negotiations.

Just hours after this meeting, US bombers struck three key Iranian nuclear sites Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz underscoring the complex interplay of military action and diplomacy.

The core message from Washington: we’re ready to rebuild, but only if Tehran gives up uranium enrichment a condition Iran has historically rejected.

What’s on the Table: Deal Terms Unpacked

While no formal agreement has been signed, sources familiar with the draft terms say the following incentives are under discussion:

• $20–30 billion investment in a non-enrichment nuclear energy program for civilian use
• Access to $6 billion in frozen Iranian funds currently held in foreign accounts
• Sanctions relief tied to progress and compliance
• Rebuilding the Fordow facility into a non-enriching plant, funded by Gulf allies

Importantly, the US will not directly finance the program. Instead, it expects Arab partners like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE to foot the bill an idea they reportedly support for regional stability.

A Non-Enrichment Civilian Nuclear Future?

At the heart of the US proposal lies a controversial demand: zero enrichment. The plan is to replicate the UAE’s nuclear model, which uses imported low-enriched uranium for energy but has no domestic enrichment infrastructure.

“How do we rebuild a better civil nuclear program for you that is non-enrichable?” asked Steve Witkoff on CNBC, adding that Iran could receive international fuel for its plants.

But for Iran, enrichment has always been a symbol of sovereignty and self-reliance. Abandoning it could be politically costly even if economically beneficial.

Gulf Allies as Financial Architects

The Trump administration has made it clear: it will not finance Iran’s new civilian nuclear infrastructure. Instead, it is asking US-aligned Gulf nations to pay for the rebuild a plan Gulf leaders are reportedly considering seriously.

“We’re willing to lead, but we won’t write the check,” said a Trump official.

For Gulf nations, this is a strategic investment: calming regional tensions, reducing nuclear risks, and reinforcing ties with the US.

Sanctions Relief & Frozen Funds

Sanctions have crippled Iran’s economy, and Tehran has repeatedly demanded relief as a condition for negotiations. This proposal includes unfreezing $6 billion in Iranian funds held overseas possibly a major breakthrough for cash-strapped Iran.

If accepted, the deal could incrementally ease sanctions, allowing Iran limited access to oil revenues and international banking.

However, US officials stress that relief would be performance-based, dependent on Iran’s full compliance with the non-enrichment condition.

Fordow: From Bombed Site to Peace Symbol?

In one of the most symbolic proposals, the US is suggesting that the Fordow nuclear site, recently bombed, be transformed into a peaceful, civilian-only facility.

This would signal Iran’s commitment to peaceful energy and serve as a trust-building measure for global observers.

Yet, questions remain. Will Iran operate this facility? Will international inspectors be allowed? And will the Iranian public accept such a transformation?

Trump’s Twin Strategy: Pressure and Engagement

President Donald Trump has oscillated between fiery rhetoric and diplomatic outreach. Just this week, he downplayed the need for a deal, saying:

“I don’t care if I have an agreement or not. We may sign an agreement. I could get a statement that they’re not going to go nuclear we’re probably going to ask for that.”

Behind the scenes, however, his advisors are pushing for a long-term framework to lock in the ceasefire and avert further conflict.

Sources confirm that five rounds of US-Iran talks took place before Israeli strikes disrupted a planned sixth round in Oman. The White House now hopes to resume talks next week, though Iran’s foreign ministry denies any scheduled meeting.

Iran’s Response: Skeptical but Engaged?

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said there are no confirmed meetings with the US, even as Qatar continues backchannel diplomacy.

Tehran remains adamant about retaining enrichment rights, viewing it as essential for energy independence and national dignity.

Yet with its nuclear infrastructure damaged and its economy under strain, Iran may face mounting pressure to compromise.

From Uranium Stockpiles to Secret Sites

Further complicating the picture are unconfirmed reports that Iran may have relocated 400 kg of uranium to undisclosed locations before the US strikes.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth dismissed these claims, but security experts warn that airstrikes may only delay not destroy Iran’s nuclear capability.

Domestic Politics and Global Stakes

Trump’s nuclear diplomacy comes as the 2024 election season heats up. A successful Iran deal could be touted as a foreign policy win, especially following military action.

But the risks are real. Critics argue that by removing enrichment, the US may be setting up Iran for long-term dependence on foreign fuel and that the deal could unravel under a future administration.

Still, the proposal marks a historic departure from the usual tit-for-tat hostility, hinting at a possible reset in US-Iran relations.

Conclusion: A Gamble with Global Consequences

This $30 billion civil nuclear proposal could either be a historic breakthrough or a diplomatic dead-end. It seeks to reshape Iran’s nuclear future while opening new channels of cooperation.

But the success of the deal hinges on two things: Iran’s willingness to relinquish enrichment and the US’s ability to hold the region together as tensions simmer. As talks loom and backchannels remain active, the world waits to see whether this bold new strategy will yield peace or simply pause the next conflict.

Also Read: Iran to Submit Counterproposal for Nuclear Deal as Uranium Enrichment Remains Key Sticking Point

Also Read: Trump Floats Insane Offers in Latest Peace Negotiations